@St_Rev Probably right. Historically, status was best defined by who had the most people under them, labor wise, politically, etc.
-
-
Replying to @IHateStapler
@St_Rev Or whomever had the most 'value' in material terms, i.e. without them, what would we lose?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @IHateStapler
@St_Rev On this basis, hierarchies formed in a organic way.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @IHateStapler
@autonomousHBD Mm. I concede the authority of the bootmaker in the matter of making boots, but most modern hierarchy is diseased.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @IHateStapler
@autonomousHBD Problem with consensual/tribal hierarchy is it doesn't scale. This bronze age pyramidal hierarchy is bullshit.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @soapjackal
@soapjackal @autonomousHBD They don't solve everything but what they do solve, nothing else comes close.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@soapjackal @autonomousHBD Reflexively objecting that markets aren't perfect (implying they are thus bad) is a Marxist zombie meme BTW.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.