@ClarkHat Had this idea for a long time. Not practical yet but in 50 years it may be the norm.
-
-
Replying to @St_Rev2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @Spivonomist
@Spivonomist@ClarkHat Hm. Good point! Pricing would be a problem.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
@Spivonomist@ClarkHat Harm of flu probably in the ~$1k-10k range. Would poor healthy people inflict it on themselves for that? Maybe.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Spivonomist
@Spivonomist@ClarkHat Actually. Actually! Easy fix: filing a claim requires you have taken reasonable measures to protect yourself.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @Spivonomist
@Spivonomist@ClarkHat Right, so you have a theoretical tort framework that is almost always avoided in favor of insurance structures.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @Spivonomist
@Spivonomist @ClarkHat well 'anarchist' doesn't mean anti-LAW, that's just silly
11:05 AM - 3 Feb 2015
1 reply
0 retweets
0 likes
-
-
Replying to @St_Rev0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.