General consensus is that Wikipedia is at least reasonably trustworthy on matters of science, but this paragraph... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anne_Fausto-Sterling#Gender_development_theory …
-
-
Replying to @lulach_cuardach
@lulach_cuardach Pretty much, yeah. But there's less and less that isn't politicized.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
@lulach_cuardach I remember an excellent article on some facet of abstract algebra that an editor took a dislike to and dismantled.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@lulach_cuardach On the grounds that a survey article is original research, or something insane like that. Pure malice.
11:35 AM - 14 Jan 2015
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.