@blue_traveler this is awkward when existing in various social friend spheres
-
-
@cwage@blue_traveler@drethelin if you're determined to fuck many people *regardless* of your relationship status then *maybe* -
@cwage@blue_traveler@drethelin but then you have other problems, including a) stop hitting yourself and b) i'm not touching you stop hitti -
@St_Rev@cwage@blue_traveler@drethelin "Less drama" == "I'll fuck who I want without having to listen to criticism from anyone?" -
@chotiari@cwage@blue_traveler@drethelin yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee eeeee EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEP
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@St_Rev@cwage@drethelin polyamorists have canned answers to this line of reasoning, but I don't find any of them convincing -
@blue_traveler@St_Rev@cwage Part of the problem is comparing Ideal Monogamy to Polyamory Failure Modes. -
@drethelin@St_Rev@cwage I don't know how one selects a non-failure mode of poly—not huge empirical data—& comparing ideals seems pointless -
@blue_traveler@St_Rev@cwage literally 8 people in the room I'm in are poly and they all seem happy with it -
@drethelin@St_Rev@cwage 8 people does not a civilizational basis make. Otherwise we're sayin "poly implemented for [outliers] in [enviro]" -
@blue_traveler@cwage this is a bullshit. "Poly is terrible and always fails" "not for these people" "yeah but what about CIVILIZATION" -
@drethelin@cwage I think that's slightly less charitable than I would portray my reasoning. -
@blue_traveler@cwage anyway: I mostly don't care about civilization-scale polyamory, that''s like, scifi. I want to know for my own benefit
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.