@themattsimpson @St_Rev Hmm, I’m not totally sure about that argument. But, there is another issue, which is that >
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
@themattsimpson
@St_Rev > It’s defined over bit strings, and the universe isn’t a bit string, and probably can’t be represented as one, >2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness @themattsimpson@St_Rev Universe can't be represented as a bit-string because infinite, or some other reason?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GrumplessGrinch
@GrumplessGrinch Because (according to best current guess) everything is real-valued.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness
@GrumplessGrinch Feynman’s final answer in Q&A of http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~christos/classics/Feynman.pdf … is relevant and interesting2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@GrumplessGrinch Whole paper is relevant, really.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness @GrumplessGrinch great speech, but 'anistropic' gnnnn
10:58 AM - 15 Dec 2014
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.