@A_P_Mason @mr_archenemy @jokeocracy They are safe. They're far safer than men, black people, gay people and trans people.
@A_P_Mason @mr_archenemy @jokeocracy Suggests much concern over their security is misapplied while black/gay/poor/trans ppl suffer though.
-
-
@St_Rev@mr_archenemy@jokeocracy You mean marginal increase in safety for white women is less important than marginal increase for anyone -
@A_P_Mason@mr_archenemy@jokeocracy Anyone else, yes. Prioritize black men, particularly gay black men, & trans people. -
@St_Rev@mr_archenemy@jokeocracy OK, but this is an insight that has to be applied precisely. When someone says "women are under attack" -
@St_Rev@mr_archenemy@jokeocracy you can tell them otherwise. When a particular woman tells you she's under a particular attack, the -
@St_Rev@mr_archenemy@jokeocracy particulars outweigh the generalities. -
@A_P_Mason@mr_archenemy@jokeocracy Yeah. But the particulars include a) the Bayesian prior is lower than for anyone else, and... -
@A_P_Mason@mr_archenemy@jokeocracy ...b) most people show a strong bias toward helping white women and ignoring others in danger. -
@A_P_Mason@mr_archenemy@jokeocracy People value white women's lives very highly--that is, they consider other lives cheaper. Fuck that. - 25 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.