#Crabquest: Training your System 1 to handle (parts of) cognitive work currently being done by System 2.
@robertskmiles @GrumplessGrinch Grothendieck claimed never to use examples, and given his innovations, I can believe it.
-
-
@robertskmiles@GrumplessGrinch Problem is, continental mathematical aristocracy decided that this was how everyone should work. -
@St_Rev You have good math intuition, maybe Grothendieck didn't. Feynman again: http://generallythinking.com/richard-feynman-on-thinking-processes-did-he-know-nothing-about-psychology-v/ … People really think differently so... -
@robertskmiles Well, brain damage/cognitive defects can lead to unusual workarounds with serendipitous benefits. -
@St_Rev Yeah. In research, neuro-variance has value. 100 identical clone researchers wouldn't progress anywhere near 100 times as fast as 1. -
@St_Rev scratch that. Meant to say "nowhere near as fast as 100 different researchers" -
@robertskmiles Well, 100 von Neumanns would progress faster than 100 randomly chosen PhDs, but I take your point. -
@robertskmiles In fact 1 von Neumann would and did. -
@robertskmiles Fat-tailed productivity distribution makes the data hard to analyze. - 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.