@St_Rev I was going to quibble but I think you can strengthen it if you clarify a *non-instrumental* desire to control ppl.
-
-
-
Replying to @simplic10
@St_Rev I don't see how even basic societies are poss w/o controlling ppl in nontrivial senses. But some just like control for its own sake.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @simplic10
@simplic10 There may not be a logical difference between "you may not do X" and "you must do Y" but there's a practical difference.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
@simplic10 The latter is Control, and I'm against it in all cases, sorry.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @simplic10
@simplic10 Contracts are entered into voluntarily; the subject surrenders their liberty to not do Y, willingly. No one forces them to sign.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @simplic10
@simplic10 A definition of control exactly as elaborate as common law--or less.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@simplic10 Let me rephrase: I oppose rulership, by anyone, anywhere. Contracts are (modulo thorny global problems in ethics) horizontal.
-
-
Replying to @St_Rev
@simplic10 I am *for* rule of *law*, for some values of law.0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.