.@asilentsky I think *some* effort on the FAI problem is justified, but @slatestarcodex’s defense seemed mostly special pleading.
@A_P_Mason @Meaningness @asilentsky Not taking God seriously and being wrong means going to Hell. Pascal's wager in cyberpunk drag.
-
-
@St_Rev@A_P_Mason @asilentsky nice summary of singularitarianism as religion. -
@Meaningness@A_P_Mason @asilentsky For what it's worth, Yudkowsky has disclaimed ∞×ε type arguments in his exchanges with Holden Karnofsky. -
@Meaningness@A_P_Mason @asilentsky Maybe one can argue singularitarianism requires ∞×ε arguments, but it's not the line that's being taken. -
@Meaningness@A_P_Mason @asilentsky Rather, it's supposed to be U×P with U a huge number and P maybe smallish but not super small. -
@MemberOfSpecies Hmm, not sure it was clear I was using “∞” as shorthand for “very large, unspecified, finite number.” -
@MemberOfSpecies If that *was* clear, I’m not sure how what I attributed to singularitarianism differs from the actual argument. -
@MemberOfSpecies (Does anyone ever use actually infinite utilities? That would be formally interesting…) -
@MemberOfSpecies The problem with “U×P, U huge, P not super small” is that it could be anything, so no meaningful way to use decision theory - 8 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@A_P_Mason@Meaningness @asilentsky I see your point. Although Yudkowskyanism seems much more certain of MWI.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.