@sarahdoingthing about ethics in general, but going back to original I doubt it’s what they had in mind. http://anglicansonline.org/basics/thirty-nine_articles.html …
-
-
@St_Rev Oh, I see! Yes. -
@Meaningness & similarly, social enforcement of supererogatory acts must be lexicographically weaker than enforcement of obligations. -
@St_Rev Excellent, yes! -
@Meaningness & actually framed that way it makes the connection to SJ phariseeism absolutely clear: the sneering 'want a cookie?' thing. -
@St_Rev I am somehow blessedly ignorant of SJ bad behavior, but I can guess what that means—and yes, does seem to explain it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.