@sarahdoingthing Jim’s interpretation of “Works of Supererogation, cannot be taught without arrogancy and impiety” seems important insight >
-
-
@St_Rev Steelmanning, Jim point was that you should not condemn anyone for doing no more than ethically compulsory. -
@St_Rev And, you should not congratulate yourself for supererogatory works, especially not in invidious comparison, i.e. SJWism. -
@St_Rev It’s pretty clear the text he cites doesn’t say anything like that, but I agree with the point. Otherwise, no ethical freedom.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.