@themattsimpson @GrumplessGrinch Let me put it another way: what on earth would P(GTR) = 0.5 mean?
-
-
Replying to @GrumplessGrinch
@GrumplessGrinch @themattsimpson It can be the case that all identified theories are false, thus makes no sense to treat them as a P-space1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GrumplessGrinch
@GrumplessGrinch @themattsimpson Again: probability is the wrong theory entirely.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
@St_Rev erf... not my field of expertise, so I'm likely to open my mouth and prove to be a fool where susp before : http://pastebin.com/N0SH4N367 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @gattsuru
@gattsuru Let me turn that on its head and point to the paragraph Matt added to the end of http://carcinisation.com/2014/09/26/the-old-evidence-problem/ …...
12:48 AM - 27 Sep 2014
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.