@themattsimpson @GrumplessGrinch So...probability doesn't tell you anything useful about positive validation of theories. Like I said.
-
-
Replying to @St_Rev
@themattsimpson
@GrumplessGrinch We just rediscovered Popper, handshakes all around1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
@themattsimpson
@GrumplessGrinch Let me put it another way: what on earth would P(GTR) = 0.5 mean?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GrumplessGrinch
@GrumplessGrinch @themattsimpson It can be the case that all identified theories are false, thus makes no sense to treat them as a P-space1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GrumplessGrinch
@GrumplessGrinch @themattsimpson Again: probability is the wrong theory entirely.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @GrumplessGrinch
@GrumplessGrinch @themattsimpson You're asking for a general theory of Figuring Out The World. There is no theory. @Meaningness's point.
3:24 PM - 26 Sep 2014
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.