The primary funding/feedback/support system for science today is how well and how vigorously a scientist works the bureaucracy.
Anecodtal false-negatives unconvincing, but there's a real problem here. Is there a creativity deficit in science? http://ars.to/WFSBsI
-
-
-
Predictable results: massive amplification of junk papers, supported by groupthink and faddishness.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.