@GrumplessGrinch @St_Rev I'm not convinced we live in a universe where anthropics is useful or interesting
-
-
@St_Rev@drethelin@Meaningness Something specific to Kolmogorov or is it all formalizations of occam's razor? -
@GrumplessGrinch@drethelin But you should really just read@Meaningness's pieces on LW. -
@St_Rev@drethelin@Meaningness I see two posts by David_Chapman on LW, neither (directly) on this topic. -
@GrumplessGrinch@drethelin@Meaningness <checks less wrong> Actually they're exactly on this topic, but the inferential distance is large. -
@St_Rev@drethelin@Meaningness I mean he didn't specifically address Kolmogorov. -
@GrumplessGrinch@drethelin Direct corollary: Kolmogorov cannot answer epistemological questions, & distracts from doing so.@Meaningness -
@St_Rev@drethelin@Meaningness Maybe it is inferential distance then. I still don't see why that should be the case.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@St_Rev@drethelin@GrumplessGrinch Sorry, i was on a plane. I’m missing some context so my replies may miss point. But…Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.