@GrumplessGrinch @St_Rev I'm not convinced we live in a universe where anthropics is useful or interesting
-
-
Replying to @drethelin
@drethelin@St_Rev Anthropics+measure is really nifty if we live in an infinite universe. Finite universe, basically useless.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GrumplessGrinch
@GrumplessGrinch@St_Rev recharacterizing risks as increasing or decreasing measure can help people think about probabilities I guess1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @drethelin
@drethelin@St_Rev Oh, and also assuming we have nonzero measure, which is also not trivial.3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GrumplessGrinch
@GrumplessGrinch@drethelin The thing that made me pretty much switch off on LW was EY's insistence that MWI was obviously correct.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
@St_Rev@drethelin Yeah. Most of my infinite-universe thinking is based on Tegmark IV.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GrumplessGrinch
@GrumplessGrinch@drethelin And Tegmark space is wildly, absurdly non-measurable.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
@St_Rev@drethelin Say more? I might have done something stupid to my epistemology.9 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GrumplessGrinch
@GrumplessGrinch@drethelin ...like "no we don't live in universe X we live in X + miracle Y that you can't observe ever"2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
@St_Rev@drethelin Is this a practical or mathematical objection?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@GrumplessGrinch @drethelin If Tegmark holds, there is NO DIFFERENCE between the two.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.