@St_Rev I privilege inaction, but speech seems different - a kind of deprivation to only see others' certified-as-correct conclusions
-
-
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@St_Rev useful to see their suspicions as well1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing I have a really unforgiving filter for people who boldly say things that are wrong. "Maybe <untrue thing>?" is OK2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing Actually I'm puzzled here. Stating boldly usually strikes me as a status grab. cf http://st-rev.livejournal.com/399666.html1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing Doesn't seem like a risky strategy for ppl like MA or Jim.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @St_Rev
@St_Rev@sarahdoingthing They're assholes. We play by different rules in status contests.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GrumplessGrinch
@GrumplessGrinch@St_Rev the implication is to look at other things that "makes wrong claims" in judging whether it's a status grab? I dunno1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
@sarahdoingthing @GrumplessGrinch So if I get strong confirming evidence I shut people out hard.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.