@St_Rev @sarahdoingthing from a non-theistic or non-Abrahamic standpoint it's really kind of a non-problem
-
-
Replying to @schakalsynthetc
@St_Rev@sarahdoingthing or more accurately, it's someone else's problem1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @schakalsynthetc
@St_Rev@sarahdoingthing there is no transcendental underwriter of truth, but there is truth.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @schakalsynthetc
@schakalsynthetc@sarahdoingthing He's convinced a lot of people who *really really* want to be convinced. But it's just not true.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
@St_Rev@sarahdoingthing some people seem to be trying to commit some kind of epistemic lustmord with this line of thinking, even1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @schakalsynthetc
@schakalsynthetc Not sure what you mean here.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @schakalsynthetc
@St_Rev armchair psychology on my part, admittedly, but as an explanatory hypothesis it kind of works1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
@schakalsynthetc It's the former who you hear the "science needs Christianity because Mendel" crap from.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.