@St_Rev < to deliver a model of generative grammar with explanatory and predictive power for natural language observed "in the wild"
-
-
Replying to @schakalsynthetc
@schakalsynthetc Chomsky seems to be a "if the theory and the data conflict, the data is in error" kind of guy.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @schakalsynthetc
@St_Rev tbf, *hypothesizing* that some observed differences are just noise in an otherwise coherent underlying system is fine2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @schakalsynthetc
@schakalsynthetc Yeah, noise is one thing, epicycles are another.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @schakalsynthetc
@schakalsynthetc 30 years ago when everybody decided being annoying and lolrandom was the correct response to the collapse of modernism1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @schakalsynthetc
@schakalsynthetc Skimmed to the Chomsky stuff, and I mostly agree, but the format was painful. My eyes aren't as good as they used to be.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@schakalsynthetc What worked at that time in that context is repetitive and twee from 30 years away.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.