@Meaningness Not rationalizable a la "home economics". Can't piss test for 'high'.
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness Yeah, but everybody knows obscenity when they see it.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness hell, I don't know. Guess I'm wrong.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@St_Rev Or, just to multiply hypotheses, being anti-drug isn’t about drugs at all, and a blanket law wouldn’t accomplish the real agenda.1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness
@St_Rev But, the most obvious “real agenda” would be justifying arbitrary police powers, and ambiguity could only help with that.#baffled3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness ...rationalistic path, like a donkey up a minaret. It's starting to obstruct the original goal, but the donkey can't get down.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
@Meaningness Well it's analogous to an idea about corporations that's been popular lately, I forget what it's called but the thesis is...
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.