@St_Rev Actually baffled as to why they don’t just criminalize “trying to get high” and “supplying something that might get people high.”
-
-
-
@Meaningness Not rationalizable a la "home economics". Can't piss test for 'high'. -
@St_Rev Ambiguity is no obstacle to the law. Can’t piss test for obscenity either. -
@Meaningness Yeah, but everybody knows obscenity when they see it. -
@St_Rev But I’m not really sure who would be embarrassed by that. -
@Meaningness hell, I don't know. Guess I'm wrong. -
@St_Rev Well, I’m still baffled, so you may be right! Quite likely the anti-drug actors are hopelessly confused about their own motivations. -
@St_Rev Or, just to multiply hypotheses, being anti-drug isn’t about drugs at all, and a blanket law wouldn’t accomplish the real agenda. - 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.