@St_Rev you're wrong right away. the point isn't that liberals are the real hypocrites, but that caring about hypocrisy is morally empty.
-
-
-
@drethelin You didn't read it. -
@St_Rev I still think you're wrong about your initial point. The rest is mostly just saying "You're applying this wrong" which is fine. -
@drethelin "You're applying this wrong" is the initial point. I should have clarified in the original question that...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@St_Rev Not sure I agree. Virtue>vice. But hypocrite commits vice, non-hypocrite commits vice *and* provides example of successful vice. -
@mikeschiffer No. 1) Non-hypocrite may or may not commit vice. 2) Providing example only matters to co-religionists/co-moralists. -
@St_Rev If non-hypocrite isn't committing vice, no one cares. If disagree on whether it's vice, q of hypocrisy is arguably a proxy for that.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@St_Rev Tho may not matter in an information society, in which examples of successful vice are ubiquitous, and hiding it long term unlikely.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@St_Rev For better or worse, (non-transparent) hypocrisy may be becoming obsolete.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.