@St_Rev consider democratic party and organized labor, which shouldn't have any natural affinities with the prog welfare state @soapjackal
-
-
Replying to @schakalsynthetc
@schakalsynthetc Succeeded pretty handily at that and suborning the Democrats by the reign of King Roosevelt II.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @schakalsynthetc
@St_Rev & those often just worked v well, better than the state-run alternatives, on top of being an important medium of self-determination1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @schakalsynthetc
@schakalsynthetc Yep. The Mutualists were A-OK in my book.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @schakalsynthetc
@St_Rev if I had to reduce it to a slogan-sized declaration I might say: in any conflict of principals vs agents, I side with the principals1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @schakalsynthetc
@St_Rev if only bc it's ethically better to let ppl fuck up their own lives than let someone else fuck it up for them against their will1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @schakalsynthetc
@St_Rev state v capital, market v planning aren't trivial or imaginary but for me principals v agents is the critical, underappreciated one3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @schakalsynthetc
@St_Rev & analyzed that way, every political position has room for factions to fall on the right and wrong side of the critical question1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@schakalsynthetc yep.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.