@soapjackal It is worth noting that the saner part of the atheism community has pushed back and pretty much cut the A+ types loose.
-
-
-
Replying to @soapjackal
@soapjackal You can make a case for Laozi if you squint very very hard (but you'll be wrong). But Zhuangzi, nope.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @soapjackal
@soapjackal There's some parallels between stoics, epicureans and pyrrhonians on one side and early daoists on the other.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @soapjackal
@St_Rev I forget the extent of which those dudes really smacked language in the face.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @soapjackal
@soapjackal It's part of what makes the texts seem so mysterious: they don't argue in familiar systematic ways because they lack the tools.
1 reply
1 retweet
1 like
-
New conversation
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.