@soapjackal It is worth noting that the saner part of the atheism community has pushed back and pretty much cut the A+ types loose.
-
-
-
Replying to @soapjackal
@soapjackal You can make a case for Laozi if you squint very very hard (but you'll be wrong). But Zhuangzi, nope.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @soapjackal
@soapjackal There's some parallels between stoics, epicureans and pyrrhonians on one side and early daoists on the other.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @soapjackal
@St_Rev I forget the extent of which those dudes really smacked language in the face.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @soapjackal
@soapjackal Instead what you see are various texts setting out different daos: "Here's how Han Fei does it, here's how Kong Fu does it..."
10:54 PM - 5 Jun 2014
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.