@St_Rev I'm just referencing the salon article. I don't know the extent to which murdering bastards consider their faith or lack thereof.
-
-
Replying to @soapjackal
@soapjackal The Salon article is unusually evil and demented even by Salon's standards.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @soapjackal
@soapjackal It is worth noting that the saner part of the atheism community has pushed back and pretty much cut the A+ types loose.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @soapjackal
@soapjackal You can make a case for Laozi if you squint very very hard (but you'll be wrong). But Zhuangzi, nope.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @soapjackal
@soapjackal Of course there was no early Daoism as such--Zhuangzi wasn't a daoist, and Laozi probably never existed.
10:52 PM - 5 Jun 2014
1 reply
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.