@St_Rev not least bc now that I've got the interpersonal context I agree it wouldn't be at all productive to try.
-
-
Replying to @schakalsynthetc
@St_Rev my read of the situation is, yeah, here's a clear case of the misfiring terror-rage response you were talking about eariler2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @schakalsynthetc
@St_Rev I wasn't planning on going aggro on anyone, btw, I wondered if it was someone my opinion carried some weight with1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @schakalsynthetc
@St_Rev my thinking was, if so then there might be an opportunity to do some respectful or at least compassionate correction1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @schakalsynthetc
@St_Rev that notion collapsed pretty much on contact, tho1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @schakalsynthetc
@St_Rev to be frank I do kind of feel like pointing out that part of the problem is that statistical expectation is inherently unfair, tho.9 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @schakalsynthetc
@schakalsynthetc But in that discourse they're glued together, so the data (which is off at an angle) can only be read as attack.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @schakalsynthetc
@schakalsynthetc I'm even willing to consider the idea that men's lives are genuinely worth less, that men deserve what they get. Except...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@schakalsynthetc & the *narrative* of overstating risk *doubles down on the mechanism of oppression*.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.