@schakalsynthetc @soapjackal But possibly that type of editor is repelled by actual accomplishment.
-
-
Replying to @St_Rev
@St_Rev@soapjackal my biased axe-grinding theory is that many self-described feminists are still deeply uncomfortable with impressive women4 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @schakalsynthetc
@St_Rev@soapjackal but bc it's socially unacceptable to feel that way openly, they cope by trivializing the accomplishments4 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @schakalsynthetc
@St_Rev@soapjackal similarly to the latently racist "aliens built the pyramids" drivel, when in fact they're monuments to engineering1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @schakalsynthetc
@St_Rev@soapjackal whereas I've actually tried to build structures using only tools & techniques available to ancient egyptians. it's HARD.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @schakalsynthetc
@schakalsynthetc@soapjackal I'm way out on the right by most ppl's standards I guess but I'm down with intersectionality.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
@St_Rev@soapjackal I'm totally down with intersectionality as a concept & methodology1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @schakalsynthetc
@St_Rev@soapjackal because it just plain fills glaring explanatory gaps in non-intersectional analyses4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @schakalsynthetc
@schakalsynthetc@soapjackal But intersectionalists can never reach that point because they a) are socialists b) suck at stat reasoning.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
@St_Rev@soapjackal or rather they're nominally socialist but usually hang on to a vestigial liberal individualist framework2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@schakalsynthetc @soapjackal Individualism for me, not for thee
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.