@david_kenneth_d @GabrielDuquette If 25 is enough to sustain the collective, they were overconsuming when 100 units were being produced.
-
-
@St_Rev@GabrielDuquette Definitely. My only rub really is the initial problem of people starving to death. -
@david_kenneth_d@GabrielDuquette Not a problem in the economics. That's a problem in the reality. In your example ppl are dead already. -
@St_Rev@GabrielDuquette Is there really no solution of simply not quadrupling the prices for just a week until a orange tree is found? -
@david_kenneth_d@GabrielDuquette Letting prices rise increases probability of finding an orange tree. Suppressing them means more deaths. -
@St_Rev@GabrielDuquette What of just raising them to prices of 40, and then to 25 a week after?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@St_Rev@GabrielDuquette As in, you do raise the prices, look like hell for other apples, while preventing population disaster. -
@St_Rev@GabrielDuquette Then afterwards you have 150 apples, and maybe think more about food security from then on obviously.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.