@St_Rev otoh saying "deterrence isn't a valid goal" is a principled answer to that
-
-
Replying to @schakalsynthetc
@St_Rev my solution is, everyone is in hell but also everyone is evil. therefore acts are really all we can validly deal with1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @schakalsynthetc
@schakalsynthetc Once you understand nihilism, you can get on with the work of being kind.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @schakalsynthetc
@St_Rev so it's kind of hard for me to parse the affective content an assertion like "everyone is racist (sexist, etc)" has for other ppl4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @schakalsynthetc
@St_Rev bc my whole meta-ethical framework is kind of predicated on "well, duh, obviously."1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @schakalsynthetc
@schakalsynthetc 1) <citation needed> 2) racist_a != racist_b != racist_c... 3) if someone is enraged by 2), they are insane; walk away.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @schakalsynthetc
@St_Rev the terms do shift underfoot in a way that can be horribly counterproductive1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @schakalsynthetc
@St_Rev where a = has conscious ill will toward other races b = acts in ways that unconsciously reinforce racial boundaries3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@schakalsynthetc a) is easy to check and doesn't describe that many people. b) is a secular version of original sin.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.