@GabrielDuquette @St_Rev Because it argues against the liberal/existentialist idea that ethics is a fundamentally individual thing, and>
-
-
Replying to @ProfessorZaius
@GabrielDuquette@St_Rev that our ideal should be for society to get the hell out of the way and let the individual decide freely between>4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ProfessorZaius
@ProfessorZaius@GabrielDuquette The response from my side is, by what right does society *stand* in the way? Probably unresolvable.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
@St_Rev@GabrielDuquette I haven't read the book in a while. I recommend you at least read the first chapter about modern ethical vocab>1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ProfessorZaius
@St_Rev@GabrielDuquette as a parallel to the state of physics in 'A Canticle for Leibowitz.'2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@ProfessorZaius @GabrielDuquette Short version: if Moore's Law holds up, in 2-300 years you MIGHT be able to run Sov. steel economy c. 1932.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.