@St_Rev that's part of it but mainly it's so that the gov't is directly exposed to the costs of health consequences of policy
-
-
Replying to @schakalsynthetc
@schakalsynthetc I think Hayek dismantled that approach pretty thoroughly.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @schakalsynthetc
@schakalsynthetc The entire health insurance industry has been a terrible failure, Ocare is worse. Socialization better than Ocare but.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @schakalsynthetc
@schakalsynthetc O-Care is worse than socialized and worse than the old US health insurance system, which was quasifascist.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @schakalsynthetc
@schakalsynthetc ...near marginal cost of production. If US imposes price controls like other systems, research becomes unprofitable.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @schakalsynthetc
@St_Rev so "if we do this we'll have to think carefully about how to ensure research can get done" is more feature than bug5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@schakalsynthetc Part of that complexity & expense is FDA oversight. Putting another gov't agency on the other side of that...
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.