@St_Rev @KarmaKaiser would love to know the flaw you find in it as it seems like the most damning, depressing evidence I've ever seen
-
-
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing@KarmaKaiser I don't remember and I'm not really in the mood to wade through it again atm.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing +6 SD is one in a BILLION, if it's really innate. I have trouble believing Gilles was the single smartest guy in Africa.2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
@St_Rev@sarahdoingthing Have no opinion about the issues in general, but: curve may have fat tail, in which case this is non-evidence…1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness@sarahdoingthing Yeah, I carefully elided that point bc 140 characters, & it opens a bunch of issues.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
@Meaningness@sarahdoingthing Though if the tail were really that fat, we'd expect to see more than a small handful of people at 190+ IQ.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
@St_Rev@sarahdoingthing Any reason to think numbers are meaningful above ~150?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness@sarahdoingthing There is the problem of 150s trying to design a test for 200s, yes.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@Meaningness Where 'g' + (or *) personality factors mostly determine real performance.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.