@St_Rev whoa really?
-
-
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing For the most part, to the limited extent that I'm willing to check details. Any particular thing in FAQ you'd challenge?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing You mean the part about Whig history?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing He's rebutting a claim by reactionaries that happiness is decreasing. Showing that there's no consensus is sufficient.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@St_Rev but my problem is more with the crowd-surfing response to it than the essay itself - relief from intellectual tension is shameful.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing I don't mean 'corrupt' as in 'leading to distasteful conclusions', I mean corrupt as in 'assumes conclusions'.
3:45 AM - 24 Nov 2013
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.