Of course there are explanations. Problem is, I've found over half a dozen of them - not even counting PKD or this http://www.sonoma.edu/users/v/vegalu/eschatology_files/Generation.pdf …
-
-
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
When there's an apparently gaping hole in doctrine, what does it mean when everyone presented with the problem has a different patch?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
In secular philosophy, it's normal for there to be a laundry list of responses to an objection.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
To what extent is it epistemically bad news when the offered responses only match when they're taken from the same source?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing Spot check spot check spot check always spot check.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing If you can't spot check, give no weight to the source. What's my opinion on the zaglafity of von Sporch? None.1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing If you can't, then the source doesn't deserve any confidence from you.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@sarahdoingthing You *can* prove a truth multiple ways, and there are popular recurring ways to be wrong, but...
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.