@tipsfromkatee @MitchDokken I missed that you had stipulated net-negative above. Sure, if it really is net negative I agree.
-
-
Replying to @simplic10
@tipsfromkatee@MitchDokken E.g., if you are installing a wheelchair ramp to the summit of Mount Everest.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @simplic10
@tipsfromkatee@MitchDokken Commonsense ethics knows reasonable accommodations when it sees them.4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @simplic10
@simplic10@MitchDokken commonsense ethics knows usury when it sees it1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
-
Replying to @simplic10
@tipsfromkatee@MitchDokken Would you care to summarize yr disagreement w me?3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @simplic10
@simplic10@MitchDokken i'm not convinced that fairness is intrinsically valuable, or worth singling out over other intrinsic values here2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GapOfGods
@simplic10 let's call all the non-fairness values together "happiness". then for fairness to intrinsically matter, it sometimes...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GapOfGods
@simplic10 ...has to be the case that it's fair to take more happiness away from people than you yourself are gaining from the transaction1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GapOfGods
@tipsfromkatee Right. I think I still do intrinsically value fairness, then. Example: you and I find a pie. Fair = split it 50-50.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@simplic10 @tipsfromkatee Smullyan's cake story: http://www.fallacyfiles.org/archive122006.html#12092006 … I think this story is EXTREMELY important & more ppl should know it
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.