@simplic10 @MitchDokken ruining people's bird-watching clubs in exchange for a lesser benefit accruing to oneself sounds similarly unfair
-
-
Replying to @GapOfGods
@tipsfromkatee@MitchDokken Don't elide the difference in degree between "impose a cost on" and "ruin".2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @simplic10
@simplic10@MitchDokken one might argue there's intrinsic value in not letting people benefit from such net-negative transactions1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GapOfGods
@tipsfromkatee@MitchDokken I missed that you had stipulated net-negative above. Sure, if it really is net negative I agree.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @simplic10
@tipsfromkatee@MitchDokken E.g., if you are installing a wheelchair ramp to the summit of Mount Everest.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @simplic10
@tipsfromkatee@MitchDokken Commonsense ethics knows reasonable accommodations when it sees them.4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @simplic10
@simplic10@MitchDokken commonsense ethics knows usury when it sees it1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
-
Replying to @simplic10
@tipsfromkatee@MitchDokken Would you care to summarize yr disagreement w me?3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @simplic10
@simplic10@tipsfromkatee@MitchDokken usury is the difference between cost to lend and value to borrower that you can extract4 replies 0 retweets 1 like
@drethelin @simplic10 @tipsfromkatee @MitchDokken How much of that gap value goes to seller and how much to buyer is a subtle problem.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.