@Charmantides I'm acknowledging a potential objection, not agreeing with the argument.
-
-
Replying to @Charmantides
@Charmantides The point I'm focusing on here is: The often repeated claim that 'there were no WMDs' is a lie.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Charmantides
@Charmantides Erm. The WMD category includes nuclear, bio and chem weapons. Iraq had bio and chem. I just said this.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Charmantides
@Charmantides They didn't have active programs by 2003. They had small caches of usable chemical weapons, and they had chem/bio equipment.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Charmantides
@Charmantides Again, I'm just saying: there were WMDs in Iraq. They kept finding more even as late as 2010.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@Charmantides Acknowledging even that much makes the 'Bush lied' narrative hard to sustain, though. It was not unreasonable, in 2003...
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.