...WMD is a misleading category, that chem & bio weapons aren't in the same class as nukes.
-
-
Replying to @Charmantides
@Charmantides I'm acknowledging a potential objection, not agreeing with the argument.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Charmantides
@Charmantides The point I'm focusing on here is: The often repeated claim that 'there were no WMDs' is a lie.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Charmantides
@Charmantides Erm. The WMD category includes nuclear, bio and chem weapons. Iraq had bio and chem. I just said this.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Charmantides
@Charmantides They didn't have active programs by 2003. They had small caches of usable chemical weapons, and they had chem/bio equipment.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @Charmantides
@Charmantides And people say 'oh but there were no WMDs' like the shells are fucking invisble or something.
12:16 PM - 8 Oct 2013
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.