...WMD is a misleading category, that chem & bio weapons aren't in the same class as nukes.
@Charmantides The point I'm focusing on here is: The often repeated claim that 'there were no WMDs' is a lie.
-
-
@St_Rev In Iraq? There really weren't. Recently been reading about it. "How to build a nuclear bomb" There was between 1991 and 1998 -
@Charmantides Erm. The WMD category includes nuclear, bio and chem weapons. Iraq had bio and chem. I just said this. -
@St_Rev Not since 1998. -
@Charmantides They didn't have active programs by 2003. They had small caches of usable chemical weapons, and they had chem/bio equipment. -
@St_Rev Oh I see. Difference is in their usage as I said. If Sadam had used them locally that would be a UN security issue. -
@Charmantides Again, I'm just saying: there were WMDs in Iraq. They kept finding more even as late as 2010. -
@St_Rev Show me. I am a lawyer if not a scientist. Because as you say if true big problem. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@St_Rev Iraq had a nuclear programme as well as chem and wmds. Sadam banned inspections so one could presume he had the same but UN signedThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@St_Rev off on him not having any since 1998. Not believing that caused a bad war and the suicide of a respected beloved scientist.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@St_Rev Without hindsight they were right to be worried. As you see with syria, chem weapons sarin particularly has a history in area.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.