@St_Rev Not quite. Chem and Bio weapons are short range weapons. They only cause collateral damage IE kill people and panic.
-
-
-
@Charmantides I'm acknowledging a potential objection, not agreeing with the argument. -
@St_Rev Ok then, then being devils advocate Id say nuclear weapons used in the right way would be as big a deal and loathed as chem and bio -
@Charmantides The point I'm focusing on here is: The often repeated claim that 'there were no WMDs' is a lie. -
@St_Rev In Iraq? There really weren't. Recently been reading about it. "How to build a nuclear bomb" There was between 1991 and 1998 -
@Charmantides Erm. The WMD category includes nuclear, bio and chem weapons. Iraq had bio and chem. I just said this. -
@St_Rev Not since 1998. -
@Charmantides They didn't have active programs by 2003. They had small caches of usable chemical weapons, and they had chem/bio equipment. - 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@St_Rev Nuclear are weapons of mass destruction that are long range. Its forbidden now to test or create new ones. The reason they aren'tThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@St_Rev banned unilaterially like chem and bio is because have legitimate military purposes. Hence security council members have them toThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@St_Rev prevent everyone else from developing them. Doesnt make much sense but its game theory and international relations being pragmaticThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.