Nozick's Wilt Chamberlain argument against income redistribution: Suppose we set up society with your favoured egalitarian distribution.
-
-
Replying to @simplic10
@simplic10 + most people I know (of) who want a perfectly egalitarian distribution are okay with banning capitalism2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ozymandias314
@ozymandias314 They realize what that means in concrete terms, right? Preventing people from exchanging stuff they want to exchange?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @simplic10
@simplic10@ozymandias314 You can't exchange stuff when the concepts of property and ownership have been abolished.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @simplic10
@St_Rev@ozymandias314 By this I mean, impossible to ban w/o violating human nature. Also, not just goods but services.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @simplic10
@simplic10@St_Rev For the tiny % of the population that wants "perfect equality" rather than "more equal than we have right now" anyway.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ozymandias314
@ozymandias314@St_Rev I'm not sure most advocates of equality know what they want.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
@simplic10 @ozymandias314 The political-economic desires of many amount to demanding bluer reds, drier water and pi = 3.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.