Disadvantage of arguing with Jaynes’ Bayes book is that presumably no one cares about it except a handful of advanced geeks.
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness do those geeks derive pop Bayesian philosophy from it or apply it to specific domains? (Disclosure: have unread copy)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @badgermind
.
@badgermind The historical connection is made here: http://lesswrong.com/lw/ul/my_bayesian_enlightenment/ … Jaynes makes Bayes The Answer To Everything—pure eternalism.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness @badgermind I think what I'm calling 'assuming the sample space is a known object' is equivalent to eternalism in your scheme.
11:04 AM - 8 Jun 2013
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.