Somewhat surprisingly, I agree with all of this by @lukeprog about when strong AI will happen (except last sentence): http://intelligence.org/2013/05/15/when-will-ai-be-created/ …
-
-
@St_Rev Yes, well, they seem to think it’s virtual inevitable. I don’t think it’s impossible, but there are numerous reasons it might not.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@St_Rev I think they don’t get that we have no idea how to start the research. After 50 years of trying, we have only negative results.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@St_Rev What we know so far is that the first hundred ideas you can have about how to do AI definitely don’t work.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@St_Rev And there haven’t been any new ideas since the mid-80s. -
@Meaningness Meanwhile, human enhancement continues apace, as the existence of this conversation demonstrates. -
@St_Rev Yeah, I’m more optimistic there. I like being omniscient, and Wikipedia on my iPhone gives me that. -
@Meaningness I have a heuristic argument that any sufficiently complex adaptive system must essentially look like a black box. -
@St_Rev Yes I agree. But can't totally rule out some magic bullet approach like "Bayesian networks are the answer." (That one's wrong, obv!) -
@Meaningness I like to say, you can find the hardware to run a human mind in any morgue, but good luck programming it. -
@St_Rev Yes; singularitarians also don't get how little we understand brains.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.