@St_Rev @semiotechnic >... if you choose Red Sox, seems to imply you think Red Sox victory has prob > 1/20 M.
-
-
@St_Rev@simplic10@semiotechnic Back in the 80s bayesians went epicyclic on that and assigned numerical degrees of ambiguity to priors. -
@Meaningness@simplic10@semiotechnic In some sense the simplest base case/toy model for epistemic logic has to be https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_logic …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@St_Rev@Meaningness@simplic10@semiotechnic that's quitter talk -
@admittedlyhuman@St_Rev@simplic10@semiotechnic That way lies epicycles (or madness, whichever comes first)! -
@Meaningness@St_Rev@simplic10 anything that can be thought about can be quantified and I don't like to think about the things that can't
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@St_Rev@simplic10@semiotechnic I guess that's gone out of fashion.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@St_Rev@Meaningness@semiotechnic Agreed. Just don't see why you draw line btw lotteries & Red Sox. Both seem garden variety probs.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.