@St_Rev @VermiciousKnid1 Original Sokal hoax had the same problem—one of many problems with it. Need to troll reputable journals instead.
@VermiciousKnid1 @Meaningness It was submitted to conference proceedings, which has no real peer review or editorial oversight.
-
-
-
@Meaningness@VermiciousKnid1 Well, Social Text had some prestige. Difference between getting into Vogue and getting into the local paper. -
@St_Rev@VermiciousKnid1 It didn’t even pretend to have a peer review system (according to wiki; I wouldn’t know). -
@Meaningness@VermiciousKnid1 It had strong editorial oversight. Downplaying that was part of the attempt at coverup. -
@Meaningness@VermiciousKnid1 cf. the self-description & submission guidelines at http://socialtext.dukejournals.org/ -
@St_Rev@VermiciousKnid1 Bleagh. Put me right off the project. You’d have to read a bunch of this crap to imitate it competently. -
@Meaningness@VermiciousKnid1 ...couldn't distinguish between 'real' work and a meaningless bluff. That was the real accomplishment. - 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.