Seriously, that is the AI equivalent of the argument that God has all properties or something. What the hell
-
-
Replying to @nicktarleton
@nicktarleton I am skeptical that a superhuman AI will be any more analytically tractable to us or to itself than we are to ourselves.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nicktarleton
@nicktarleton My suspicion is that analytic tractability creates a huge complexity hit, again I have to point to Dennett.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nicktarleton
@nicktarleton Also influenced by reading Derek Lowe. Just the grimy details of figuring out how simple molecules work is hypercomplex.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
@St_Rev@nicktarleton Having done both AI and med chem professionally, +1. Science is hard. Science fiction (= LW/Singularity) is easy.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@Meaningness @nicktarleton Eroom's Law seems significant, though there are massive confounders there.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.