Is no one in the LW cluster applying basic portfolio theory to their charity theory? LW consensus seems appallingly naive.
-
-
Replying to @admittedlyhuman
@admittedlyhuman ...whose utility you're trying to maximize. There are a TON of insights from portfolio theory that seem applicable.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @admittedlyhuman
.
@admittedlyhuman@muflax If nothing else (& there are other reasons) embarassment-risk-aversion from your charity turning out to be a scam.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @admittedlyhuman
@admittedlyhuman@st_rev@muflax I don't think so? I'd be pretty embarrassed if siai turned out to be a scam but not proportionately more?5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @drethelin
@drethelin@admittedlyhuman@muflax If you gave X/5 dollars to 5 charities and one turned out to be a scam, would you be 1/5 as embarassed?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
@St_Rev@admittedlyhuman@muflax somewhat confounded by how I use charity to purchase utilons+fuzzies. I probably wouldn't be embarrassed1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@drethelin @admittedlyhuman @muflax I am getting sufficiently annoyed by the problem that I may be able to concentrate on a rebuttal.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.