This is vile, though.https://twitter.com/davidminpdx/status/1163551879227252736 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I really don't think an insurance company is going to GAF if anyone goes to jail or not, so long as they can minimize claim payments & maximize income. After all, that's their business, literally. It helps if you can't sue them when they do fuck up & report you to the cops.
-
The insurance company is motivated to a) recover losses and b) avoid incurring losses in the future. Grabbing a random person and pinning the crime on them doesn't serve either purpose.
-
Recovering losses and fraud prevention are major balance sheet items in many lines of business.
-
These are operations that insurance companies would (and often do) fund privately. Some jurisdictions contract them out to the state. The work has to be done regardless, and it has to interface with the state at some point. A lot of it is just about not stepping on toes.
-
I mean, think about malpractice insurance. In that line, insurance companies frequently fund the customer's legal defense. Is that nefarious?
-
Not if the insurance company wants to avoid a payout, no.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.