It's not inept. Cato is trying to take advantage of people's gullibility and lack of logical comprehension of statistics. It's ... Catoish.
-
-
-
They weaken their case by letting people infer 23% are illegal, which isn't right either. If it were me I'd say it's immigrants doing important jobs that citizens won't, but that's probably too spicy for Cato.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Ignores demographics in exactly the same way, just opposite valence.
-
Base rate obfuscation, but they leave themselves open to people inferring that the other 23% are illegal. Just not well thought out at all.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Very typical
@CatoInstitute. They also love to publish graphs promoting that some super high percentage of drug smuggling takes place at official border crossings when what they are actually measuring are arrestsThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.